Log in

No account? Create an account
LogJam [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]

[ website | LogJam ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Maddening 'feature'. [Dec. 8th, 2004|08:55 pm]


[Current Mood |frustratedfrustrated]
[Current Music |Cowboy Bebop Blue: Autumn In Ganymede]

I've got Logjam 4.4.0. Starting with this build (I forget what I jumped from) if I use Insert -> Link and there is a URL in the cut buffer it will automatically insert a link using that URL instead of calling up the link dialog.

I can't tell you how much I hate this. This hits me almost every time I use LogJam since with the work I do I almost always seem to have some URL in my cut buffer. And it is *never* what I want to use as a link. I'd been using LogJam for a long time and I'm used to having the dialog open, then entering what I want. Now it is Insert -> Link... curse at LogJam. Delete bad link. Go highlight and copy some other text to make the damn thing stop. Then Insert -> Link, enter what I want it to use.

Can we please go back to the old way? Or add some preference toggle for this? Changing long established UI behavior is bad mojo.

(Deleted comment)
[User Picture]From: aredridel
2004-12-09 03:12 am (UTC)
How about always bringing up a dialog, and if there's a URL in the selection or copy buffer, pre-filling the text entry with it?
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: zonereyrie
2004-12-09 03:33 am (UTC)
That's cool too. Especially if a 'Reset' button were added to the dialog, along with Cancel and OK, so that when stray URLs get in there you can rapidly flush and do what you meant.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: aredridel
2004-12-09 04:21 am (UTC)
How about just starting with the URL higlighted if there is one. Enter to accept, backspace or just start typing to use your own.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: zonereyrie
2004-12-09 04:22 am (UTC)
That works.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: cparker
2004-12-15 11:40 pm (UTC)
This is pretty much one of the only frustrations I have with LogJam, and if it could be fixed to match what aredridel suggested, LogJam would be perfect (AFAICT, anyway).
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)