Log in

No account? Create an account
failure to install on SuSE 9.0 - LogJam [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]

[ website | LogJam ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

failure to install on SuSE 9.0 [Jan. 10th, 2004|03:22 pm]


Using the RPM, upgrading from 3.0.4 (installed by compiling from source and using checkinstall):
linux:/usr/src # rpm -Uvh packages/logjam-4.2.3-1.i386.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libcom_err.so.3 is needed by logjam-4.2.3-1
libcrypto.so.4 is needed by logjam-4.2.3-1
libgssapi_krb5.so.2 is needed by logjam-4.2.3-1
libk5crypto.so.3 is needed by logjam-4.2.3-1
libkrb5.so.3 is needed by logjam-4.2.3-1
libpspell.so.4 is needed by logjam-4.2.3-1
libssl.so.4 is needed by logjam-4.2.3-1

linux:/usr/src/logjam-4.2.4 # ./configure
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking for mingw... no
checking for pkg-config... /usr/local/bin/pkg-config
checking for gtkspell-2.0... yes
checking for libgtkhtml-3.0... not found
checking for librsvg-2.0 > 2.2.3... not found
checking for gtk+-2.0 gmodule-2.0 libxml-2.0 gtkspell-2.0... Package libxml-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libxml-2.0.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'libxml-2.0' found

configure: error: Library requirements (gtk+-2.0 gmodule-2.0 libxml-2.0 gtkspell-2.0) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them.

From: geekosaur
2004-01-10 11:28 pm (UTC)
You need the devel packages for those libraries. Note that SuSE 9 personal edition doesn't have the devel packages; they're only included with the professional edition. (This strikes me as kind of dumb.) You can get them from the FTP site, though.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: terpsichoros
2004-01-11 12:17 am (UTC)
I have the professional edition, but in at least one case that I looked, SuSE is using an older version of the library than is RedHat.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: synestine
2004-01-11 01:00 am (UTC)

Missing/Wrong Versions

First, it looks like the i386.rpm didn't install because you've got an older/newer version of OpenSSL (I forget which right now). Depending on what distro that i386.rpm was compiled on, it was linked against OpenSSL 0.9.6 or 0.9.7, which seems to have changed the library version, and hence the filename.

Also, it looks like what it's really missing is the libxml-2.0 development package. Under RedHat (SuSE may be the same way), libxml and libxml-devel are separate packages. To compile from source, you need the -devel version of that package installed along with the regular version (often you have to do this by hand because the installer doesn't install devel packages by default). Also (And this is what has confused most of my friends before) is that when ./configure says it's looking for whatever package, it actually means the -devel version of that package.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: terpsichoros
2004-01-12 05:55 am (UTC)

Re: Missing/Wrong Versions

I have libcom_err.so.2 - the rpm asks for libcom_err.so.3
I have libcrypto.so.0.9.7 - the rpm asks for libcrypto.so.4
I have libgssapi.so.1- the rpm asks for libgssapi_krb5.so.2
I don't have libk5crypto.so.3, at least not anything with a similar name.
I have libkrb5.so.17 - the rpm asks for libkrb5.so.3
I have libpspell.so.15 - the rpm asks for libpspell.so.4
I have libssl.so.0.9.7 - the rpm asks for libssl.so.4

SuSE spells libxml-2 as libxml2, which might cause errors with ./configure even though I have the devel packages installed.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: synestine
2004-01-12 05:26 pm (UTC)

Re: Missing/Wrong Versions

On my system, libcom_err.so.3 is owned by krb5-libs-1.3.1-6, libcrypto.so.4 is a symlink to libcrypto.so.0.9.7a, libgssapi_krb5.so.2 is also owned by krb5-libs-1.3.1-6, and it seems like the majority of them are compile-time options in the security libs. As for the libxml-2 vs libxml2, that's possible. If the .pc (IIRC) file isn't named the right way, pkgconfig can't find it, however, if you symlink it, it may just get past that.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)